Weekly Download #5: Borders and E-Books, Apple Earnings, Smartphones, Intel

Borders bites the dust (maybe inevitably), Apple posts a phenomenal quarter because of great smart phone sales, and Intel is sadly struggling because they haven’t gotten into that smartphone space as effectively. This show could be sponsored by you – Visit weeklydownload.com and click on “Sponsorships”. If you love the show, let us know by rating us on iTunes. Thanks!

Play
Posted in Apple, Business, Intel, News, Podcast | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Weekly Download #5: Borders and E-Books, Apple Earnings, Smartphones, Intel

Link: Apple Changing Up Corporate America →

“Apple sold 33 million iPads, iPhones, and iPod Touches, just a 6% less than under the estimated second-quarter shipments of personal computers from Hewlett Packard, Dell, and Lenovo- combined.”

It appears the “Post-PC” era Apple continues to talk about is finally starting to arrive.

Posted in Apple, Business, HP, iOS | Permalink | Comments Off on Apple Changing Up Corporate America

Link: A View From The Top →

Erik Slivka, Macrumors:

Samsung and HTC lead the Android pack and have experienced very strong growth, but each company’s smartphone shipments remains about half that of Apple’s.

People vote with their wallets.

Posted in Apple | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on A View From The Top

Link: Softness In Mature Markets →

Intel is reporting a a smaller growth in shipment from before. The main reason?:

Intel’s processors are used in 80 percent of the world’s PCs, but mobile devices from Apple Inc’s iPad to Google Inc Android smartphones are eating into laptop sales and Intel is struggling to gain a foothold in the fast-expanding mobile market.

Deals like what ARM is making with Microsoft need to occur for Intel’s business to evolve. It will not be very long before Apple moves to fully custom built chips (A8 in MacBook Airs).

Posted in Intel | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Softness In Mature Markets

Key Remarks from Siracusa’s Review of 10.7

You should read the 19 page review on Ars. Especially if you are at all interested in the technical aspects of a very shocking install, recovery and overall experience of Lion. Here are some of the more interesting and notable tidbits:

  • On Page 2, John notes that a recovery partition is made after installing Lion. This recovery partition includes the Disk Utility. Also:

There’s also an option to get help online, which will launch Safari. Including Safari on the recovery partition is a nice touch, since most people’s first stop when diagnosing a problem is Google, not the Genius Bar.

  • On the login screen, the menu bar status icons are still visible. This is on top of a brand new look with the linen texture we are familiar with from iOS 5 notifications or Dashboard widgets that come preinstalled on a Mac. Having the status icons are fantastic and a great way to get a measure of battery life other than from the side LED lights.
  • By default, Lion scrolling is inverted like scrolling on the iPad. This makes intuitive sense on an all-touchscreen device — the content moves with your finger. On a computer, however:

The effect is extremely disconcerting, as our fingers unconsciously flick at the scroll-wheel while our eyes see the document moving the “wrong” way.

Lion’s scroll bars are a microcosm of Apple’s new philosophy for Mac OS X. This is definitely a case of reconsidering a fundamental part of the operating system—one that hasn’t changed this radically in decades, if ever. It’s also nearly a straight port from iOS, which is in keeping with Apple’s professed “back to the Mac” mission. But most importantly, it’s a concrete example of Apple’s newfound dedication to simplicity.

  • Resizing from any side is now possible, as was noted in the Lion keynotes. What is interesting is the pixel space used to make this effect work. So really, the space that a scroll bar takes up is replaced by the invisible border you can target. You do save about 10 pixels all the way around, though. Page 4:

Two to three pixels doesn’t make for a very wide target, however, which is why Apple has chosen to appropriate pixels from both sides of the window border. Four to five pixels outside the content area of the window are also clickable for window resizing purposes. Clicks in these areas don’t get sent to the window (they’re out of the window’s bounds) and they don’t get sent to whatever happens to be behind the active window—you know, the thing that you ostensibly just clicked on. Effectively, Lion windows have thin, invisible borders around them used only for resizing.

  • There are a lot of animations that may seem overwhelming to the user. I saw this on Chris’s GM seed. When switching from space to space, there is a consistent sliding motion, as if I was watching a Powerpoint. This is pretty eye-candy, but can get pretty annoying. Siracusa does not note any place to disable them. Perhaps this is a Terminal command.
  • You can learn what a skeuomorph is.
  • There is a great deal of time spent on how the physical metaphor hasn’t completely translated on Page 5. For example, iCal looks like an actual desk calendar, but there are no gestures to “rip” the pages out or “peak” at the next page. Similar woes occur with the Address Book. I feel that the only great UI change in the core apps was Mail, which takes advantage of two-pane navigation and “conversation” views beautifully.
  • Regarding Spaces on Page 6:

The biggest limitation of this new arrangement is that Spaces are now confined to a one-dimensional line of virtual desktops. Four-finger swiping between spaces feels great, but there’s no wrap-around when you hit the end.

  • You no longer have to manually save a document; documents are saved as versions if the application supports the API. There are several tradeoffs and benefits described on Page 7. But here’s a quirky one:

Putting it all together, this means that you can log out or shut down your Mac without being asked any questions by needy applications and without losing any of your data or window state. When you next log in, the screen should look exactly the same as it did just before you logged out. (In fact, Lion appears to “cheat” and briefly presents a static image of your earlier screen while it works on relaunching your apps and restoring your open documents. Sneaky, but an effective way to make state restoration feel faster than it really is.)

  • In general, I find the save feature to be much better, but I didn’t find an explicit mention on the trade-offs for disk space. I remember that these saves are delta saves, so only the differences are kept. In theory this means only incremental changes in file size, at worst.
  • Chris noted in the Lion podcast that the small dots that indicate if a program is on is no longer present by default. Siracusa notes that this is because of a new feature — Automatic Termination:

 Lion will quit your running applications behind your back if it decides it needs the resources, and if you don’t appear to be using them. The heuristic for determining whether an application is “in use” is very conservative: it must not be the active application, it must have no visible, non-minimized windows—and, of course, it must explicitly support Automatic Termination.

  • This sounded like it was taking a page from iOS. In fact, it sounds like it is like permissions that are more implicitly expressed:

In Lion, the sandbox security model has been greatly enhanced, and Apple is finally promoting it for use by third-party applications. A sandboxed application must now include a list of “entitlements” describing exactly what resources it needs in order to do its job. Lion supports about 30 different entitlements which range from basic things like the ability to create a network connection or to listen for incoming network connections (two separate entitlements) to sophisticated tasks like capturing video or still images from a built-in camera.

  • Page 9 through 13 are not for the faint-hearted — a detailed look at the file system and security within Lion. Importantly, there are latent protections provided with the encryption software in FileVault, but also implicit ones with sandboxing (described above).
  • Page 14 covers a new HiDPI model for resolutions, which preps the future of displays to allow for resolution independence.
  • Page 15 covers the finder, and it is nice to see that the “capsule-style” searches are present in Lion.
  • Mail has three panes!
  • System wide auto-correction. Apparently, this is something you should disable immediately.
  • About This Mac got a major facelift.

In all, the last sentences sum up the future of Mac OS:

Over the past decade, better technology has simply reduced the number of things that we need to care about. Lion is better technology. It marks the point where Mac OS X releases stop being defined by what’s been added. From now on, Mac OS X should be judged by what’s been removed.

Posted in Apple, Features, Lion | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Key Remarks from Siracusa’s Review of 10.7

Link: MacBook Airs Become Everyday Machines →

With 4GB standard and a multi-threaded processor, the MacBook Air has replaced the bottom end of the Apple laptop line. Not a bad bottom end, either.

Posted in Apple | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on MacBook Airs Become Everyday Machines

Link: 27,000 Words As An E-Book →

John Siracusa’s review of Lion is available as an e-book for $4.99.

Peter Cohen provides some perspective.

Posted in Apple, Lion | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on 27,000 Words As An E-Book

Link: One-Click Twitter Shopping →

Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry, via SAI:

A commercial offer on Twitter wouldn’t be a pitch followed by a link, it would be a pitch followed by a “click to buy” button. Click once. BOOM. You’ve bought it. Twitter’s chairman and product leader, Jack Dorsey, knows a thing or two about building a seamless payments experience from his other company, Square.

Posted in Business, Twitter | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on One-Click Twitter Shopping

Link: Lion: Now Available →

As promised (and rumored), Mac OS 10.7 Lion is available on the Mac App store for download. (You could buy the USB disk for $69, though, which answers many of the lingering questions for people who own Macs in areas with terrible internet.)

Chris has given a nice review of some of the key features on our blog, and both of us have talked shop on Weekly Download #3.

Posted in Apple, Lion | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Lion: Now Available

Link: OS X Lion Coming to the App Store July 20 →

During Apple’s Q3 Conference call it was revealed that Lion will launch on July 20.  There was no set time frame mentioned during the call, just that it was happening tomorrow.  The upgrade will be 29.99 and weighs in at 4GB.  Be sure to check out my thoughts on Lion from last week and have a listen to our podcast dedicated to Lion before making the download.

Posted in Apple, Lion | Tagged , , , , | Permalink | Comments Off on OS X Lion Coming to the App Store July 20

Link: Schmidt Makes Dig at Apple →

Yesterday in a post about HTC’s falling share prices I said things would start to get interesting.  Well, today Google Chairman Eric Schmidt has come out and said:

“We have seen an explosion of Android devices entering the market and, because of our successes, competitors are responding with lawsuits as they cannot respond through innovations.”

Posted in Apple, Business, Google, iOS, Mobile | Tagged , , , , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Schmidt Makes Dig at Apple

Link: MacDonald’s →

Peter Oppenheimer, Apple CFO:

Apple Retail has been in business for 10 years. During this period, we have had over 1 billion visitors through our doors, many of whom are new to the Mac, as the Apple Store is the best place to learn about all the latest products from Apple,” said the spokesperson.

(via MacRumors)

Posted in Apple | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on MacDonald’s

Link: Exactly This →

MG Siegler:

Of course, we can rest-assured knowing that Twitter is very likely are not this foolish. After being in business for a full five years, they must know by now that their strength is not to mimic every just-launched and hot-right-now new social network (in this case, Google+). Their strength is to remain true to what got them to my where they are now: simplicity.

My sentiments exactly, just more spot on.

Posted in Google, Social Networking, Twitter | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Exactly This

Link: Borders Is Not Dead Because of E-Books →

Harry McCracken:

If e-books didn’t exist, I’m pretty positive that Borders would have still collapsed in much the same way. It might have cratered even if the Internet had never been invented. I’m sorry to see it go, and particularly sorry for the folks who will be out of work. But the market worked. Borders is dying because it simply wasn’t very good at selling books in the 21st century.

Barnes & Nobles may be slightly better, but you have to think they are concerned with this move.

Posted in News | Permalink | Comments Off on Borders Is Not Dead Because of E-Books

Link: HTC Shares Tumble; Patents to Blame? →

It’s no secret that the competition between Apple and Google is quite intense, but things may have just heated up a little bit more.  With Apple winning the initial patent dispute between it and HTC things could get very interesting.

Financial Times attributed the sell-off to “investor fears that the legal battle could have wider implications for the competitive balance between Apple and Google Android-based phonemakers like HTC, Samsung, and Motorola.”

Posted in Android, Apple, iOS, Mobile, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Permalink | Comments Off on HTC Shares Tumble; Patents to Blame?

Weekly Download #4: Microsoft & Tablets, Netflix, Google Earnings, Spotify

Microsoft is trying to play catchup, Netflix is taking a turn in a different direction, and Google is sitting pretty with the Q2 earnings call. All this and a little (large) plug about a service that we both haven’t used yet.

Play
Posted in Google, Microsoft, Netflix, Podcast | Tagged , , | Permalink | 2 Comments

Link: Scoble Thinks Twitter Is Boring →

The more important ideas you have, the more influential you become. The more influential you are, the more engagement. This is true for both Twitter and Google+.

The difference between them is the medium. Google+ allows for a happy medium between Twitter and Facebook. It allows for a high stream of engagement. The problem with this is the engagement is long-winded, mostly unheard, and incredibly unorganized. On Twitter, you also have a high engagement mark, but the posts can be just as lost in clutter and spam. At the least, Twitter’s character limit makes people get to the point or share items in a different venue, which is something that becomes a problem on a venue like Google+ — Scoble’s posts themselves can be a little long* and the threads he builds are equally long. I cannot see why this would be any more favored to Twitter.

There are two big reasons why there is “passion and excitement”:

  1. Google+ is new, so people are excited to get involved with a conversational thread that is psuedo-personal.
  2. Google+ is invite only and fosters “small-world” or “groupthink” like conversations.

The first reason is circumstantial. The second reason is a nature of the service. Of course there is passion in a technology thread when all the people are going to be technology oriented, as the service is invite-only.

Boring seems to strong. Twitter now has a niche that is clearly differentiated alongside Google+. On the same lines, Facebook is also establishing one. There is no need (yet), for any company to start making large changes. In many ways, the lack of change is what makes Twitter great.

* – To be fair, some posts can be shorter; however, the longer the post or share, the longer the engagement. In any case, there is likely a good number of people who like the shorter style of communication.

Posted in Features, Google, Twitter | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Scoble Thinks Twitter Is Boring

Link: Poor memory? Blame Google →

The actual article is behind a paywall via Science, but this quote was particularly telling:

Just as we learn through transactive memory who knows what in our families and offices, we are learning what the computer ‘knows’ and when we should attend to where we have stored information in our computer-based memories. We are becoming symbiotic with our computer tools.

Incidentally, Google also makes the “where” easier by making you ‘feel lucky’. Also, it is telling that this article decided to pick Google, rather than the generic term ‘search engine’, as their target.

Posted in Google, Research | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Poor memory? Blame Google

Possible Privacy Hole in Google+

I noticed that if a friend of mine decides to share a link with me, the share falls in the range of a “limited network” and is only visible to me. This share is only visible to two people: myself and the sharer.

If I wanted to share his post from my stream, I may do so by clicking share. Google+ is aware that the original share was in a limited network, so there is a message that pops up:

This post was originally shared with a limited audience — remember to be thoughtful about who you share it with.

I can still decide to share the post anyway, but there is a problem: the share attributes the original poster. So if Johnny had a link from someecards.com and shared it only with me, I can reshare this link with my extended circles (but not public circles) and the share would attribute Johnny as the originator of the link.

This yields an unintended result: Johnny is exposed as a sharer of potentially explicit content, unbeknownst to him. In fact, I could exclude Johnny from seeing my reshare, but his name would still be attached to the post. I could simply create a circle with everyone but Johnny included.

The implications for this privacy hole are obvious: a person’s name is at stake if the share was meant to be private. But, there is also a general point that needs addressing: when you share a link with someone with confidence, what does it mean? I find it can mean:

  1. Johnny has given you (and only you) permission to reshare the link with his name on it.
  2. Johnny has shared the link with you so that the link stays with you.

Option 2 seems like the more intended purpose of a limited share. If Option 1 is the case, then perhaps Google+ doesn’t have a problem. But, it seems more likely that users would want their privacy maintained. The ideal fix would be to eliminate attributions on reshares entirely, or not allow reshares that were intended for a limited network.

Posted in Features, Google | Tagged , , | Permalink | 3 Comments

Link: 350 Billion > 1 Billion →

Nice catch, MG Siegler:

Today, exactly 5 years to the day since they launched, Twitter adds the context. Google+ may be serving up 1 billion items a day, but Twitter is doing 350 billion items a day.

Posted in Google, Twitter | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on 350 Billion > 1 Billion

Link: LTE Not the End of Carrier Separation →

For a year or so my friends and I have enthusiastically awaited the arrival of real “4G”.  When I say this, I mean LTE.  Carriers are using all kinds of gimmicks and tricks to call their networks 4G, but the fact of the matter is they aren’t there yet.  Verizon is first to party as it has already rolled out its LTE implementation in several markets.  Over the past year or two I’ve assumed, along with many others, that when AT&T pushes out its LTE implementation, users would be able to take their device from one network to the other.  This is currently not possible because Verizon runs on a “CDMA” network while AT&T runs on the more popular (globally) “GSM” network.

In the past few days it has come out that even though they will be using the same type of network, they will not be using the same spectrum of that network.  What does this mean for you and me?  Well, it looks like we’re not going to be able to jump from one carrier to another and keep our same phone, at least not unless the manufacturer of the phone puts a radio that covers both spectrums….

Posted in Android, iOS, Mobile, WebOS | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Permalink | Comments Off on LTE Not the End of Carrier Separation

Link: Look Who Decided to Join the Party →

Known as Tulalip (also the name of a group of Native American tribes near Redmond), the project promises to help users “find what you need and share what you know easier than ever” — which, at this early stage, is pretty difficult to do, considering that the page’s search field is non-functioning.

Why have something on public domain when you are that big of a company? It just shows once again how Microsoft is always late to the party.

Posted in Microsoft, Social Networking | Permalink | Comments Off on Look Who Decided to Join the Party

Weekly Download #3: Mac OS 10.7 (Lion)

ROAR! Chris Robbins gives his take on Mac OS 10.7, Lion.

Play
Posted in Podcast | Tagged , , | Permalink | Comments Off on Weekly Download #3: Mac OS 10.7 (Lion)

iOS + Mac OS = 10.7

We are likely a week away from the official release of OS X 10.7, Lion. I have been testing this operating system since Developer Preview 1 came out.  I must admit, at first, Lion seemed like something I just was not interested in.  When Steve took the stage and said the goal was to bring the best of iOS to the best of OS X I was quite skeptical.  I personally like my mobile devices to be my mobile devices and my computer to be, well, my computer.  After a few solid months of wrestling with the OS, I’ve come to a few conclusions have a few things to share.

Let’s start with some of the pleasant notes:

Resume & Auto-Save

Resume, from day 1 was a feature I loved.  Running an OS in its early development stages can lead to some problems and quite a few restarts.  For the first time ever previewing an operating system didn’t make me want to hurt someone when it crashed.  Just as advertised, the machine ends up right back where it was before the restart.  Now that the OS is a little more polished, the restarts are less frequent but it is still fantastic to know that I no longer have to worry about losing any data.

For the first time in my computing life, I do not feel like I’m stuck waiting to restart my computer.  Little updates or new installs are no longer something I have to strategically plan out.  When I want to install something, I install and do not blink an eye at the idea of restarting anymore.  I also find myself actually turning my computer off a little more often.  In the past I would never dream of turning my computer off, it was always a quick shutting of the lid for sleep mode.  While this is still the most convenient when it comes to bringing the computer back up next time, it still isn’t too bad when you do power it back on.

Auto save and resume to me go hand and hand. The only time I have ever really lost a document is when I’m restarting and somehow miss the save prompt when the computer starts to restart.  I have tested the feature a few times and can attest to it working.  Certainly this will be helpful for some people.

Mission Control

Mission control was a feature I was quite displeased with at first.  I felt as though Apple had done something all wrong.  I loved Expose and the way it kept everything organized. When I launched Mission Control for the first time, I almost reverted back to Snow Leopard instantly.  I thought this was a cluttered mess that made no sense.  Now that I have played with it for several months, I must admit I’m quite in love with the new feature.  It really makes things easy when using the full screen apps.  This feature is something you will just have to get used to, but when you do, you’ll find that it is actually wonderful.

iOS Features to the Mac

Deep integration between the two operating systems was clearly the goal with Lion.  In my opinion there were some features that brought significant improvements to OS X while there were others that I’m still shaking my head wondering what exactly the point is.

When it comes to Launchpad, it just doesn’t make sense to me.  I see where they were going with the whole “your apps are all in one place” feel, but to me, the applications folder does a fine job.  Given that you have to actually push a button or make a gesture on the trackpad to get into Launchpad, it seems pretty pointless.  This to me makes the feature more cumbersome than it does helpful.  Perhaps I am missing something here, but I do not think I am.  This is a feature I’m predicting just doesn’t catch on all that well.

One iOS feature I did not like at first, but quickly fell in love with is full screen apps.  I feel like Apple is on to something here that will take off quite well.  I feel like as a Mac user I’ve always wanted to be able to see multiple windows at a time and did not believe in the maximize button.  This has all changed with the full screen applications.  I do not feel bothered or distracted by anything else while working anymore.  I feel as though everything is out of my way when I’m working in a certain program.  When I get iChat messages they will pop up in the application I’m working in.  This genuinely bugs me now.  I’ve gone from wanting to see everything in one place to someone who loves have all of my screen for each individual app.  Spaces was something I never really fell in love with, but this feature is now a “must-have.”

A feature I loved from day one with Lion that came right from iOS: multi-touch gestures.  The gestures make moving from desktop to desktop (Spaces) a breeze.  As previously mentioned, I love using full screen applications now.  I can quickly move between these full screen applications with a quick swiping gesture.  The “tap-to-zoom” gesture has also been a nice added bonus.  Like its iOS counterpart, it does a great job of zooming in on content you want to take a closer look at.  The one feature I did NOT enjoy was the new style of scrolling.  Apple is trying to mimic the iOS scrolling where a downward two finger motion sends you up and an upward motion sends you down.  This is the complete opposite of how it has been done on an Apple trackpad for years now.  I feel as though it is going to be a difficult learning curve for many users.  I turned this feature off on the first day and still have yet to try it again.  I do not think I will be making the switch until I’m forced to…

Having iOS 5 has made this experience a little unique.  Apple has built in some nice integration between the two with iCloud and the new version of iTunes.  This new version of iTunes can be had on 10.6, but I still feel as though it is worth a mention.  I have officially “cut the cord” from my life.  Wireless syncing has been fantastic thus far.  The integration runs deeper than just wireless syncing.  Users of the iWork suite will find their documents sync up wonderfully.  Documents in the Cloud is a new feature of Apple’s new service iCloud that will save people lots of headaches.  I can now go to a pages document on my computer, edit it, save it, and magically, it is back on my iPad ready to go.

This is a quick little review of some of the most note worthy items within Lion.  Next week everyone will get to experience for themselves and really formulate an opinion on the OS.  In the mean time, feel free to send any comments with questions about a new feature or how something works.

Posted in Apple, Features, iOS, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Permalink | Comments Off on iOS + Mac OS = 10.7

Link: Google Earnings for Q2 2011 →

In our podcast last week we talked a little bit about cash and how companies like Google, Microsoft, and Apple are using it.  Some people are a little frustrated over the amount of cash each of these companies has on hand, but continues to hold on to.

Google has just released their Q2 earnings for fiscal year 2011 and showed some great success:

Cash – As of June 30, 2011, cash, cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $39.1 billion.

Google has quite a bit of cash on hand, but as mentioned before, this isn’t always a bad thing.  That is plenty of money for innovation and development.  What do you think should happen with this cash on hand?

Posted in Business, Google | Permalink | Comments Off on Google Earnings for Q2 2011